The “world does not end, the blue bird does not return, love does not reveal itself in all of its profound tenderness and charity, and death and mourning and crying and pain do not disappear.” Yuri Slezkine.
Viewing entries in
Politics and Economics
Here’s what they said they'd rather do with their time:
- Spend quality time with loved ones (55 percent)
- Pursue a creative passion, like art, music, video (39 percent)
- Travel (38 percent)
- Go to school (32 percent)
- Volunteer (29 percent)
- Take care of their heath (29 percent)
- Take care of child (children) (29 percent)
So we have at least 6.1 million poorly paid full-time workers with limited earning potential. If they had a guaranteed UBI, I imagine some of these individuals would get off the treadmill and manage with the UBI, perhaps working part-time or taking on the occasional full-time gig.
Family farms of various types together account for 99 percent of all farms, and those account for 89 percent of the production as of 2015.
So how many workers in today's labor market would choose not to work or work fewer hours if they got a UBI? We've already got 35% who are good candidates: rejected applicants for SSDI/SSI and part-time workers.
Now what does this have to do with a Universal Basic Income (UBI)? It's part of my project to estimate (roughly!) how many Americans would drop out of the labor market, reduce their hours, or otherwise downshift their career aspirations if they could count on an UBI.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, about 15% of American workers are part-time by choice; in other words, they don't want to work full-time. Another 3% of American workers are part-time for economic reasons, meaning they want to work full-time but have either had their hours reduced due to business conditions or simply cannot find full-time employment. These workers are typically young, male, single, and poorly educated.
The number of non-earners (read: non-taxpayers) and part-time workers will likely skyrocket. They will be supported by the rest of the population, especially households in the top two income quintiles.
Wealth does not measure the inherent value of an asset, only its market value at a particular point in time. Sources of wealth include real estate, stocks, bonds, bank deposits, pensions, and mutual funds. One's own home is the main source of wealth for the majority of Americans, except the most affluent.
Slowly but surely the US is catching on to the advantages of using nurse practitioners as independent primary care gatekeepers. A big factor in the gradual acceptance of this expanded role for nurse practitioners is the shortage of GPs, which has left millions of Americans without access to primary care providers.
In the US, the incentives are aligned to test more, treat more, and charge more. It's no surprise that, on average, the US spends almost twice as much on its healthcare system than other developed countries. And it's no surprise that our doctors are among the highest paid in the world.
When we're talking about exorbitant medical fees, we're talking mostly about doctors' fees. Physicians make way more in the US than other developed countries - about twice as much. What do other countries do to contain physician fees? Lots of things, including...
Since developing human capital requires financial resources and the returns to skills and education are higher than ever, the children of low-income families are at a disadvantage. But it doesn't have to be so. We just have to make sure the building blocks of human capital are there for all income levels.
Who are the one percent? Technically, households with an adjusted gross income of at least $465,626. But who are those people? Many work in occupations that pay so well they have plenty of money available to get richer still through profitable investments. Many work in the following occupations...
The point of raising tax rates is to raise tax revenue. However, raise the rate too high and tax payers will change their behavior to lower their tax bill. So is there a sweet spot for taxing the top earners in this country, where we can get the most revenue for our rate? Here's what the IMF has to say...
In developed countries, inequality of income is driven largely by a wage disparity between the highly skilled and the less skilled. Social mobility is stymied by lack of skills. Why don't some people acquire the skills they need to move up the economic ladder? Why are some people stuck?
What fosters social mobility? That is, what helps individuals move up the economic ladder? Mostly job skills and connections. In developed countries, job skills matter more than ever. Economic opportunity beckons those with the right skill set.
...many generations of Americans wanted to do better than their parents - especially when their parents struggled. For much of American history, our parents struggled. It's only been the last 50 or so years that most of us could take a breather. Is doing better than one's parents still the be all/end all of the American Dream? Should it be?
Housing is the biggest component of the Consumer Price Index and the hardest to spend less on in the near term, because costs like rent and mortgage are fixed (unlike food, where buying fewer prepackaged or fast-food meals can generate considerable savings). What people spend on housing pretty well reflects what they think they can afford over time. So how much has the cost of housing changed since 1999?
Lots of patterns to detect from these tables. In both 1999 and 2015, lower-income folk spent quite a bit more than their reported pretax income - evidence that pretax income is not a very good indicator of actual financial resources. In both years, households in the top two income quintiles had more earners, fewer seniors and were bigger than households in lower quintiles. It also appears that all income groups spent quite a bit more in 2015 than in 1999. So is life getting better overall for Americans? At this point, not enough data. Stay tuned.